Kinetic energy components; furthermore, its maximum values had been observed immediately after midnight (01:002:00), and in the morning (09:002.00) and evening hours (18.002:00). This is explained by the influence on the underlying surface. At altitudes of 2500 m, the ratio in the turbulent towards the mean kinetic wind power weakly depended on the altitude, except the period just after midnight (00:002:00). The character with the Cetylpyridinium Epigenetics altitude dependence changed at night (03:004:00), in the afternoon (14:005:00), and late within the evening (21:002:00). At altitudes beneath 100 m, the contribution on the turbulent kinetic wind power component was tiny, and the ratio (z) was in the variety 0.010. The diurnal behavior of your Umov vector depended both around the time of the day along with the sounding altitude. Three layers had been clearly distinguished: the near-surface layer at altitudes of 55 m, the intermediate layer at altitudes from 15 m to 150 m, along with the layer of enhanced turbulence above. The irregular behavior in the kinetic energy flux vector in the near-surface layer was explained by the impact on the underlying surface. FPL64176 Calcium Channel inside the intermediate layer whose altitude 1st enhanced from 25 m at 01:00 to 100 m at 03:00, the power transfer in the north-western direction prevailed. From 05:00 until 15:00, the path of power transfer changed to south-western with simultaneous increase on the altitude from the intermediate layer to 150 m. Then, from 15:00 till 18:00, the direction of power transfer remained unchanged, however the lower boundary in the layer of enhanced turbulence decreased to 100 m. From 19:00 till 22:00, the path of power transfer changed to north-western, along with the reduced boundary in the layer of enhanced turbulence decreased to 75 m. From 23:00 until 24:00, the energy in the reduced layer was transferred in the east-southern path. Above this layer, within the layer of enhanced turbulence, the character of power transfer changed radically, the kinetic power flux density increased sharply, as well as the direction of power transfer fluctuated resulting from a higher contribution of your turbulent kinetic power element. The maximum kinetic power flux densities were observed at 18:00, when the kinetic power was predominantly transferred inside the south-western direction. The spatiotemporal dynamics from the Umov vector is often utilized to elucidate time periods and altitude ranges of its maximal and minimal values also as prevailing directions of total kinetic power transfer, which is, to detect instances and altitudes most and least favorable for flights of unmanned aerial automobiles, to estimate the effect of wind on high-rise buildings, and to predict the wind power prospective of wind turbines.Author Contributions: Conceptualization, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; methodology, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; computer software, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; validation, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; formal evaluation, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; investigation, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; sources, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; information curation, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; writing–original draft preparation, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; writing–review and editing, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; visualization, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; supervision, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; project administration, A.P., N.K. and L.S.; funding acquisition, A.P., N.K. and L.S. All authors have read and agreed for the published version from the manuscript. Funding: This study was carried out with the monetary assistance with the Russian Academy of Sciences within the framework from the State Assignment towards the Institute of.
