Tio on the kinetic wind energy components established by us in [10]: the near-ground layer, the surface layer, the layer with linear boost on the kinetic wind energy components, and also the transitive layer. Inside the near-ground layer, at altitudes up to 25 m, attention is drawn to sharp modifications in the ratio on the kinetic energy elements; furthermore, its maximum values were observed immediately after midnight (01:002:00) and within the morning (09:002.00) and evening hours (18.002:00). This really is explained by the influence with the underlying surface. At altitudes of 25-100 m, the ratio on the turbulent to mean kinetic power weakly depended around the altitude, except the period soon after midnight (00:002:00). The character on the altitude dependence changed at night (03:004:00), in the afternoon (14:005:00), and late within the evening (21:002:00). Also, at night and within the morning (00:004:00), (z) was in the range 0.0100; in the evening, the span of its values elevated to 0.01,000, then from 23:00, it decreased once more to 0.0100.Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER Assessment Atmosphere 2021, 12,8 of 11 eight of��-Thujone Technical Information Figure three. Diurnal hourly dynamics of the ratio on the turbulent to the mean kinetic wind energy components on semiFigure 3. Diurnal hourly dynamics on the ratio of the turbulent to the mean kinetic wind energy components on semi logarithmic scale. logarithmic scale.four.3. Diurnal Hourly Dynamics on the Total Kinetic Flux Power TP-064 manufacturer density Vector (the Umov Vector) 4.3. Diurnal Hourly Dynamics of the Total Kinetic Flux Power Density Vector (the Umov vector) As currently indicated inside the introduction, the total wind kinetic power flux density vector is made use of for an evaluation and prediction in the dynamic wind impact. Figure 4 shows As already indicated within the introduction, the total wind kinetic power flux densityvector is applied for an evaluation and prediction with the dynamic wind effect. Figure 4 shows the diurnal hourly dynamics from the mean kinetic flux power density vector j (z, t) obtained by postprocessing of minisodar measurements. The minisodar information were averaged more than the diurnal hourly dynamics of the imply kinetic flux energy density vector j z,t 10 min periods.-Atmosphere 2021, 12,rection of power transfer changed to southwestern with simultaneous raise of zturb to 150 m. Then, from 15:00 till 18:00, the path of energy transfer remained unchanged, however the reduce boundary from the layer of enhanced turbulence zturb decreased to one hundred m. From 19:00 until 22:00, the path of power transfer changed to northwestern, and zturb de 9 of 11 creased to 75 m.-Figure four. Diurnal hourly dynamics of the kinetic power flux density vector j (z, t)(northern direction–upwards, southern–downwards, east–to the ideal, and western–to the left). The j of wind Figure four. Diurnal hourly dynamics of the kinetic energy flux density vector thatz, tthe(northern di magnitude in the vector is depicted by its length, and its path coincides with- rection–upwards, southern–downwards, east–to the correct, and western–to the left). The mag vector V(z, t) (see Figure 1). nitude from the vector is depicted by its length, and its direction coincides with that in the wind vector It really should be underlined that this figure illustrates the total (imply and turbulent) V z , t energy transfer. It can be seen that it depends each around the time from the day and also the kinetic (see Figure 1). sounding altitude. 3 layers can clearly be distinguished in Figure 3: a near-s.
