Rther study (from hereon referred to simply as Sox2-MB; 59 Cy3-CCTCGGTACTTATCCTTCTTCATCGAGG-BHQ2 39). To test if a commercially available delivery vehicle can also be used to deliver the Sox2-MB to mES cells we used lipofectamine2000, a cationic lipid. Flow cytometry showed that the Sox2-MB had a 2.0-fold higher mean fluorescence as compared with theStatistical AnalysisThe two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used to analyze if a difference in two data sets was statistically significant. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant (*p,0.05, **p,0.Sorting Live Stem Cells Based on Sox2 mRNAFigure 3. Detection of Sox2-MB in differentiated mES cells. (A) mES cells Title Loaded From File stained for SSEA-1 together with the Sox2-MB (blue dots) and the nonspecific-MB (red dots). (B) SSEA-1 stained differentiated mES cells treated with Sox2-MB (blue dots) were compared to SSEA1 stained undifferentiated mES treated Sox2-MB (red dots). (C) Undifferentiated mES cells and mES cells differentiated by exposure to RA were analyzed with RT-PCR. (D) Four quadrants (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) of the differentiated mES cells were selected by comparing the nonspecific-MB Memory Th1 repertoire.Persisting bim2/2 SMARTA “Memory” Cells are Functionally DefectiveThe fluorescent signal with the Sox2-MB fluorescent signal. (E) The double-positive sorted cell populations (Q2: Sox2-MB+ and SSEA1+) formed significantly more undifferentiated colonies compared to the positive-negative sorted cell populations (Q1: Sox2-MB- and SSEA1+ Q4: Sox2-MB+ and SSEA12 ), and the double-negative sorted cell population (Q3: Sox2-MB- and SSEA12). (F) 23388095 Undifferentiated colonies were positively stained for Sox2, Nanog and SSEA1 (Scale bar = 200 mm). Error bars represent the mean 6 SEM. Asterisks denotes statistical significance (n = 3 samples **p,0.01, n = 4 samples***p,0.001). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049874.gSorting Live Stem Cells Based on Sox2 mRNAFigure 4. Isolation of neurospheres from primary mouse tissue and of in vitro cultured neurospheres using Sox2-MB. (A) Two cell populations, namely Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow, were first selected on Annexin-V- cells and then by comparing the nonspecific-MB fluorescent signal to the Sox2-MB fluorescent signal. (B) After 1 wk, sphere-forming efficiency was calculated from the Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow populations as well as non-sorted primary mouse hippocampus isolated cells. (C and D) Images of 1 wk old spheres generated from sorted Sox2MBlow cells and Sox2-MBhigh cells (scale bar = 25 mm). (E) Neurospheres from the Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow populations were serially passaged and cumulative population doublings was calculated. (F) In vitro cultured neurosphere mRNA expression of Sox2 was analyzed by RT-PCR and compared to MEFs. (G) Two cell populations, namely Sox2-MBhigh and Sox2-MBlow, were selected by comparing the nonspecific-MB fluorescent signalSorting Live Stem Cells Based on Sox2 mRNAto the Sox2-MB fluorescent signal. (H) After 1 wk, sphere-forming efficiencies were calculated. (I) Neurospheres formed by the Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow populations were stained for Sox2 and Nestin, or secondary antibodies only (control) (scale bar = 50 mm). Error bars represent the mean 6 SEM. Asterisks denotes statistical significance ((n = 5 samples *p,0.05, n = 3 samples***p,0.001). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049874.gnonspecific-MB (Figure S3). The cationic micelle delivery vehicle (Figure 2C) provided a 4.6-fold higher mean fluorescence signal when delivering Sox2-MB 1662274 in Sox2+ cells than did the cationic lipid vehicle (Figure S3). To.Rther study (from hereon referred to simply as Sox2-MB; 59 Cy3-CCTCGGTACTTATCCTTCTTCATCGAGG-BHQ2 39). To test if a commercially available delivery vehicle can also be used to deliver the Sox2-MB to mES cells we used lipofectamine2000, a cationic lipid. Flow cytometry showed that the Sox2-MB had a 2.0-fold higher mean fluorescence as compared with theStatistical AnalysisThe two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used to analyze if a difference in two data sets was statistically significant. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant (*p,0.05, **p,0.Sorting Live Stem Cells Based on Sox2 mRNAFigure 3. Detection of Sox2-MB in differentiated mES cells. (A) mES cells stained for SSEA-1 together with the Sox2-MB (blue dots) and the nonspecific-MB (red dots). (B) SSEA-1 stained differentiated mES cells treated with Sox2-MB (blue dots) were compared to SSEA1 stained undifferentiated mES treated Sox2-MB (red dots). (C) Undifferentiated mES cells and mES cells differentiated by exposure to RA were analyzed with RT-PCR. (D) Four quadrants (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) of the differentiated mES cells were selected by comparing the nonspecific-MB fluorescent signal with the Sox2-MB fluorescent signal. (E) The double-positive sorted cell populations (Q2: Sox2-MB+ and SSEA1+) formed significantly more undifferentiated colonies compared to the positive-negative sorted cell populations (Q1: Sox2-MB- and SSEA1+ Q4: Sox2-MB+ and SSEA12 ), and the double-negative sorted cell population (Q3: Sox2-MB- and SSEA12). (F) 23388095 Undifferentiated colonies were positively stained for Sox2, Nanog and SSEA1 (Scale bar = 200 mm). Error bars represent the mean 6 SEM. Asterisks denotes statistical significance (n = 3 samples **p,0.01, n = 4 samples***p,0.001). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049874.gSorting Live Stem Cells Based on Sox2 mRNAFigure 4. Isolation of neurospheres from primary mouse tissue and of in vitro cultured neurospheres using Sox2-MB. (A) Two cell populations, namely Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow, were first selected on Annexin-V- cells and then by comparing the nonspecific-MB fluorescent signal to the Sox2-MB fluorescent signal. (B) After 1 wk, sphere-forming efficiency was calculated from the Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow populations as well as non-sorted primary mouse hippocampus isolated cells. (C and D) Images of 1 wk old spheres generated from sorted Sox2MBlow cells and Sox2-MBhigh cells (scale bar = 25 mm). (E) Neurospheres from the Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow populations were serially passaged and cumulative population doublings was calculated. (F) In vitro cultured neurosphere mRNA expression of Sox2 was analyzed by RT-PCR and compared to MEFs. (G) Two cell populations, namely Sox2-MBhigh and Sox2-MBlow, were selected by comparing the nonspecific-MB fluorescent signalSorting Live Stem Cells Based on Sox2 mRNAto the Sox2-MB fluorescent signal. (H) After 1 wk, sphere-forming efficiencies were calculated. (I) Neurospheres formed by the Sox2-MBhigh and the Sox2-MBlow populations were stained for Sox2 and Nestin, or secondary antibodies only (control) (scale bar = 50 mm). Error bars represent the mean 6 SEM. Asterisks denotes statistical significance ((n = 5 samples *p,0.05, n = 3 samples***p,0.001). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049874.gnonspecific-MB (Figure S3). The cationic micelle delivery vehicle (Figure 2C) provided a 4.6-fold higher mean fluorescence signal when delivering Sox2-MB 1662274 in Sox2+ cells than did the cationic lipid vehicle (Figure S3). To.
