Ial cells were pelleted by centrifugation and 2.5 ml of the conditioned media recovered. Conditioned media from biofilm and planktonic cultures was filtered with 0.22 syringe filters and concentrated using Amicon Ultra-0.5 3K centrifugal filter units (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). 10 of the concentrated media was tested using the SensoLyte Red Protease Assay Kit (AnaSpec, Inc., Fremont, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with a 2.5 hour incubation at 37?C. Fluorescence intensity (excitation 546 nm/emission 575 nm) was PM01183MedChemExpress PM01183 measured in a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and is proportional to protease activity in the sample. Sterile TSB-GN medium concentrated in the same manner as the conditioned media samples was used as a control.data demonstrate that swine LA-MRSA strains form robust biofilms similar to human MRSA strains, including clinical HAMRSA (USA100) and CA-MRSA (USA300) strains.Inhibition of biofilm formation by enzymatic treatmentRecent studies suggest that for S. aureus biofilms, the extracellular matrix consists of proteins, DNA, and/or polysaccharide (poly-(1,6)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or PNAG, also referred to as the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or PIA) [58?1]. The relative importance of these components in the matrix structure routinely varies order 1,1-Dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride between bacterial species and between strains within the same species [58,59,61]. Enzymes capable of breaking down the different matrix components can inhibit or prevent biofilm formation. To begin addressing the importance and functional role of these components in swine LA-MRSA strains, we tested the ability of Proteinase K, DNaseI and dispersion B (DspB) to inhibit biofilm formation. When Proteinase K was added to the media at the time of inoculation, biofilm formation was significantly inhibited in the majority of strains tested, including swine LA-MRSA strains (Figure 2). This indicates that proteinaceous material forms a significant component of the biofilm matrix in these strains. The addition of Proteinase K did not significantly inhibit biofilm formation by strains MN06, HU01010T, and USA300. The lack of significant inhibition observed by strains MN06 and HU01010T is due to the large standard deviation among the biological replicates for these strains. Despite the lack of significance, the addition of Proteinase K resulted in a 91 reduction in biofilm formation by strain MN06, and 96 reduction in biofilm formation by HU01010T, while only resulting in a 23 reduction for strain USA300. Interestingly, the two CA-MRSA (USA300) strains tested here differed in their sensitivity to Proteinase K. We found S. aureus strain USA300 to be resistant to the effect of Proteinase K under these conditions, whereas strain TCH1516, which is also considered a USA300-type strain, was found to be sensitive to Proteinase K (Figure 2). In contrast to the S. aureus strains, biofilm formation by the S. epidermidis strains 1457 and NJ9709 was not sensitive to Proteinase K inhibition (Figure 2). In fact, addition of Proteinase K seemed to cause a significant increase in biofilm formation by S. epidermidis strain 1457 (Figure 2). Treatment by DNaseI has been shown to inhibit biofilm formation by a number of bacterial species, including S. aureus [59,61?3]. As shown in Figure 3, addition of DNaseI to the culture medium at the time of inoculation had a varying effect on biofilm formation, with the tested strains displaying a range of sensitivity.Ial cells were pelleted by centrifugation and 2.5 ml of the conditioned media recovered. Conditioned media from biofilm and planktonic cultures was filtered with 0.22 syringe filters and concentrated using Amicon Ultra-0.5 3K centrifugal filter units (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). 10 of the concentrated media was tested using the SensoLyte Red Protease Assay Kit (AnaSpec, Inc., Fremont, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with a 2.5 hour incubation at 37?C. Fluorescence intensity (excitation 546 nm/emission 575 nm) was measured in a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and is proportional to protease activity in the sample. Sterile TSB-GN medium concentrated in the same manner as the conditioned media samples was used as a control.data demonstrate that swine LA-MRSA strains form robust biofilms similar to human MRSA strains, including clinical HAMRSA (USA100) and CA-MRSA (USA300) strains.Inhibition of biofilm formation by enzymatic treatmentRecent studies suggest that for S. aureus biofilms, the extracellular matrix consists of proteins, DNA, and/or polysaccharide (poly-(1,6)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine or PNAG, also referred to as the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or PIA) [58?1]. The relative importance of these components in the matrix structure routinely varies between bacterial species and between strains within the same species [58,59,61]. Enzymes capable of breaking down the different matrix components can inhibit or prevent biofilm formation. To begin addressing the importance and functional role of these components in swine LA-MRSA strains, we tested the ability of Proteinase K, DNaseI and dispersion B (DspB) to inhibit biofilm formation. When Proteinase K was added to the media at the time of inoculation, biofilm formation was significantly inhibited in the majority of strains tested, including swine LA-MRSA strains (Figure 2). This indicates that proteinaceous material forms a significant component of the biofilm matrix in these strains. The addition of Proteinase K did not significantly inhibit biofilm formation by strains MN06, HU01010T, and USA300. The lack of significant inhibition observed by strains MN06 and HU01010T is due to the large standard deviation among the biological replicates for these strains. Despite the lack of significance, the addition of Proteinase K resulted in a 91 reduction in biofilm formation by strain MN06, and 96 reduction in biofilm formation by HU01010T, while only resulting in a 23 reduction for strain USA300. Interestingly, the two CA-MRSA (USA300) strains tested here differed in their sensitivity to Proteinase K. We found S. aureus strain USA300 to be resistant to the effect of Proteinase K under these conditions, whereas strain TCH1516, which is also considered a USA300-type strain, was found to be sensitive to Proteinase K (Figure 2). In contrast to the S. aureus strains, biofilm formation by the S. epidermidis strains 1457 and NJ9709 was not sensitive to Proteinase K inhibition (Figure 2). In fact, addition of Proteinase K seemed to cause a significant increase in biofilm formation by S. epidermidis strain 1457 (Figure 2). Treatment by DNaseI has been shown to inhibit biofilm formation by a number of bacterial species, including S. aureus [59,61?3]. As shown in Figure 3, addition of DNaseI to the culture medium at the time of inoculation had a varying effect on biofilm formation, with the tested strains displaying a range of sensitivity.
