3 = highest mention. The task of scale coding–For each GGTI298 cost thematic category, a team of two or more independent coders conducts scale coding. Given that the thematic analysis of a single focus question typically generates 3 to 12 thematic categories, each member of a two- or threeperson team of coders independently rates all response codes within each thematic category. In this process, we have used a coordinating supervisor who oversees the work of the two or three independent coders. The supervisor also participates in “Round Table 2,” a “scale coding round table review,” in which team members compare their independent response code ratings for matches (concordances) and nonmatches (discordances) across coders. Via a constant comparison review and discussion, the goal is to agree on the most accurate scale code ratings that capture with fidelity the tenor of participant’s responses. From our prior research, we have identified two ways to conduct scale coding: (a) frequency scale coding and (b) intensity scale coding. For intensity scale coding, a 4-point scale codingNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript6The balance between creating a smaller number of broad thematic categories versus creating a larger number of narrow but more specific thematic categories is an important IMM thematic coding issue. It should be noted that a given thematic category may contain 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more response codes from a particular case, for example, case ID101, yet zero responses from another case, for example, case ID102. 7Previously we referred to this process of dimensionalization as “axial coding,” but as this usage is in conflict with the term axial coding, as defined by Strauss and Corbin (1990), we have changed our terminology in reference to this dimensionalization to “scale coding.”J Mix Methods Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 11.Castro et al.Pagescale has worked best (Denne et al., 2001). The levels of “intensity scale coding” are the following: (0) = no mention–the theme is not expressed in any way; (1) = suggested mention–suggestive of the theme; (2) = basic mention–a clear mention of that theme; and (3) = emphatic mention–a mention with strong emphasis or great intensity. Frequency scale coding–Frequency scale coding is the more rudimentary of these two forms of scale coding, although it also yields higher levels of interrater agreement. For a given case, frequency scale coding simply involves counting the number of mentions of a given theme, that is, the number of response codes appearing within a given case ID number.8 For example, under the thematic category of “physically controlling and abusive,” and for case [ID133], the thematic statement about “controlling” responses appeared three times: (a) “He rules, his home as his castle”; (b) “[He] runs his house like a king, or worse like a slave driver”; and (c) “[His] wife and kids are there to serve him.” These three functionally equivalent responses involving dominant control were assigned to the “physically controlling and abusive” thematic category as mentioned by case [ID133]. Thus, for participant/case [ID133], the frequency-of-mention scale code value for the “physically controlling and abusive” thematic category is a value of “3.” Frequency scale codes are tabulated in a MGCD516MedChemExpress MGCD516 Case-Theme Scale Coding Matrix for ease of inspection. This matrix simply lists all cases in rows and all thematic categories (families) in columns. Fo.3 = highest mention. The task of scale coding–For each thematic category, a team of two or more independent coders conducts scale coding. Given that the thematic analysis of a single focus question typically generates 3 to 12 thematic categories, each member of a two- or threeperson team of coders independently rates all response codes within each thematic category. In this process, we have used a coordinating supervisor who oversees the work of the two or three independent coders. The supervisor also participates in “Round Table 2,” a “scale coding round table review,” in which team members compare their independent response code ratings for matches (concordances) and nonmatches (discordances) across coders. Via a constant comparison review and discussion, the goal is to agree on the most accurate scale code ratings that capture with fidelity the tenor of participant’s responses. From our prior research, we have identified two ways to conduct scale coding: (a) frequency scale coding and (b) intensity scale coding. For intensity scale coding, a 4-point scale codingNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript6The balance between creating a smaller number of broad thematic categories versus creating a larger number of narrow but more specific thematic categories is an important IMM thematic coding issue. It should be noted that a given thematic category may contain 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more response codes from a particular case, for example, case ID101, yet zero responses from another case, for example, case ID102. 7Previously we referred to this process of dimensionalization as “axial coding,” but as this usage is in conflict with the term axial coding, as defined by Strauss and Corbin (1990), we have changed our terminology in reference to this dimensionalization to “scale coding.”J Mix Methods Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 11.Castro et al.Pagescale has worked best (Denne et al., 2001). The levels of “intensity scale coding” are the following: (0) = no mention–the theme is not expressed in any way; (1) = suggested mention–suggestive of the theme; (2) = basic mention–a clear mention of that theme; and (3) = emphatic mention–a mention with strong emphasis or great intensity. Frequency scale coding–Frequency scale coding is the more rudimentary of these two forms of scale coding, although it also yields higher levels of interrater agreement. For a given case, frequency scale coding simply involves counting the number of mentions of a given theme, that is, the number of response codes appearing within a given case ID number.8 For example, under the thematic category of “physically controlling and abusive,” and for case [ID133], the thematic statement about “controlling” responses appeared three times: (a) “He rules, his home as his castle”; (b) “[He] runs his house like a king, or worse like a slave driver”; and (c) “[His] wife and kids are there to serve him.” These three functionally equivalent responses involving dominant control were assigned to the “physically controlling and abusive” thematic category as mentioned by case [ID133]. Thus, for participant/case [ID133], the frequency-of-mention scale code value for the “physically controlling and abusive” thematic category is a value of “3.” Frequency scale codes are tabulated in a Case-Theme Scale Coding Matrix for ease of inspection. This matrix simply lists all cases in rows and all thematic categories (families) in columns. Fo.
