And CM MDL 28574 agencies had . (SD .; range) inside the last months.Bivariate analysis (Table)Following the analyses with the descriptive statistics of each and every variable, we divided the number of EOL circumstances into twoSecond, bivariate analyses were conducted to learn associations amongst the provision of EOL care situations andIgarashi et al. BMC Res Notes :Web page ofTable Qualities of homecare nurse, residence helper, and care manager agenciesHomecare nurse n n Dwelling helper n n Care manager n n Median (percentile) Median (percentile) Median (percentile) Number of employees (FTE) Nursing staff Quantity of customers month Agency ownership Social welfare corporation Profit corporation
Healthcare corporation Other individuals Other healthcare facility owned by the identical organization Care management agency Homecare nursing agency Dwelling support agency Healthcare facility Nonbed clinic Variety of collaborating HN agencies Variety of collaborating HH agencies Variety of collaborating CM agencies Number of collaborating healthcare facilities Extra reimbursement for intensive service By longterm care insurance coverage By healthcare insurance coverage Accepting endoflife consumers Homecare nurses and dwelling helpers could pay 
a visit to customers collectively Variety of clientele who died at household or months, mean SD . The figures of each item were not equal towards the total quantity of the participants on account of missing values; percentages for each and every item had been calculated following excluding missing values SD normal deviationcertain variables. For HN agencies, the following variables have been positively related using the provision of EOL care inside the final months at p .the amount of FTE staff , the amount of clientsmonth , the type of agency corporation , the number of collaborating CM agencies (p .), the number of collaborating healthcare facilities , added reimbursement for intensive care by the LTCI as well as the healthcare insurance coverage systems , and no matter whether homecare nurses and residence helpers could take a look at consumers with each other . For HH agencies, the following variables had been positively related using the provision of EOL care at p .the amount of FTE staff , the number of consumers month , owning a CM agency in the similar organization , the number of collaboratingCM agencies , added reimbursement for intensive service by LTCI , and acceptance of EOL consumers (p .). For CM agencies, variables positively connected with all the provision of EOL care at p . had been as followsthe variety of FTE employees , care manager(s) who possess(es) nursing license , the number of clientsmonth , owning an HN agency inside the same organization , the number of collaborating HN agencies , the number of collaborating HH agencies , extra reimbursement for intensive service , and no matter whether homecare nurses and household helpers could visit clients together . For HN agencies and CM agencies, the amount of clientsmonth had been strongly correlated together with the number ofIgarashi et al. BMC Res Notes :Web page ofTable Associations between the provision of EOL care and agency characteristicsHomecare nurse, n Provision of EOL Care No Agency traits Quantity of staff . The figures of every single item weren’t equal for the total variety of the participants as a consequence of missing values; percentages for each and every item had been calculated soon after excluding missing valuesa bMann hitney U test Chi square testsFTE in Spearman’s rankcorrelation coefficient (r . and PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26463949 respectively), but for HH agencies, the correlation was not strong . In addition, in all varieties of agencies, the correlation together with the variety of FTE and also other variables weren’t.And CM agencies had . (SD .; range) in the last months.Bivariate evaluation (Table)Following the analyses with the descriptive statistics of every single variable, we divided the number of EOL cases into twoSecond, bivariate analyses had been carried out to uncover associations amongst the provision of EOL care cases andIgarashi et al. BMC Res Notes :Web page ofTable Qualities of homecare nurse, residence helper, and care manager agenciesHomecare nurse n n (+)-MCPG custom synthesis Property helper n n Care manager n n Median (percentile) Median (percentile) Median (percentile) Quantity of employees (FTE) Nursing employees Number of clients month Agency ownership Social welfare corporation Profit corporation
Healthcare corporation Other people Other healthcare facility owned by the exact same organization Care management agency Homecare nursing agency Home help agency Healthcare facility Nonbed clinic Quantity of collaborating HN agencies Quantity of collaborating HH agencies Quantity of collaborating CM agencies Quantity of collaborating healthcare facilities More reimbursement for intensive service By longterm care insurance By healthcare insurance Accepting endoflife clientele Homecare nurses and residence helpers could pay a visit to consumers with each other Quantity of clientele who died at dwelling or months, mean SD . The figures of each and every item were not equal to the total quantity of the participants due to missing values; percentages for each item had 
been calculated following excluding missing values SD normal deviationcertain elements. For HN agencies, the following variables had been positively linked using the provision of EOL care within the last months at p .the amount of FTE employees , the number of clientsmonth , the kind of agency corporation , the number of collaborating CM agencies (p .), the amount of collaborating healthcare facilities , more reimbursement for intensive care by the LTCI and the healthcare insurance systems , and no matter if homecare nurses and home helpers could stop by clients with each other . For HH agencies, the following variables had been positively linked with the provision of EOL care at p .the amount of FTE staff , the number of customers month , owning a CM agency in the very same organization , the amount of collaboratingCM agencies , more reimbursement for intensive service by LTCI , and acceptance of EOL consumers (p .). For CM agencies, variables positively linked using the provision of EOL care at p . had been as followsthe quantity of FTE staff , care manager(s) who possess(es) nursing license , the number of clientsmonth , owning an HN agency within the very same organization , the amount of collaborating HN agencies , the amount of collaborating HH agencies , added reimbursement for intensive service , and whether or not homecare nurses and property helpers could pay a visit to clients collectively . For HN agencies and CM agencies, the amount of clientsmonth were strongly correlated with all the quantity ofIgarashi et al. BMC Res Notes :Page ofTable Associations involving the provision of EOL care and agency characteristicsHomecare nurse, n Provision of EOL Care No Agency traits Variety of staff . The figures of every item weren’t equal to the total quantity of the participants as a consequence of missing values; percentages for every item have been calculated following excluding missing valuesa bMann hitney U test Chi square testsFTE in Spearman’s rankcorrelation coefficient (r . and PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26463949 respectively), but for HH agencies, the correlation was not robust . Furthermore, in all forms of agencies, the correlation together with the variety of FTE and other variables weren’t.
