Expanding season vegetation greenness was positively correlated with all the growing season precipitation,season vegetation greennessthe expanding season temIn common, the developing and negatively correlated with was positively correlated with perature and vapor pressure deficit (Figure 7). The interannual dynamics of vegetation at the increasing season precipitation, and negatively correlated together with the expanding season the two high-elevation stations correlate small with temperature, precipitation, or VPD, Icosabutate manufacturer temperature and vapor stress deficit (Figure 7). The interannual dynamics of vegetation suggesting that aspects besides temperature and moisture manage interannual vegetaat the two high-elevation stations correlate tiny with temperature, precipitation, or VPD, tion dynamics there. suggesting that factorsair temperature was negativelymoisture control interannual vegetation The developing season other than temperature and correlated using the expanding seadynamics there. son vegetation greenness, along with the correlation coefficients were PSB-603 Purity & Documentation statistically insignificant exceptThe increasing on grassland. This suggestswas negatively correlatedvegetation expanding at a single station season air temperature that warming didn’t drive with all the season vegetation greenness, and this area, and coefficients were statistically insignificant development in the interannual time scale inthe correlation inversely, vegetation development could possibly have cooled the near-surface air temperature (Figure S2) that warming did not drive vegetation except at one station on grassland. This suggests together with the enhanced evapotranspiration in the interannual time scale in this area, and inversely, vegetation development might development in the vegetation green-up. Furthermore, the magnitudes in the correlation among temperature and vegetation greenness had been usually significantly smaller than these from the correlation in between humidity (i.e., precipitation and VPD) and vegetation greenness. This suggests that the interannual vegetation dynamics within this region may well be driven by soil moisture and atmospheric humidity–that is, precipitation and VPD, if we assume that precipitation is related to soil moisture, and VPD represents air humidity.four.4. Interannual Covariation involving the Vegetation Greenness and Climatic FactorsRemote Sens. 2021, 13,ten ofRemote Sens. 2021, 13,have cooled the near-surface air temperature (Figure S2) with all the enhanced evapotranspiration from the vegetation green-up. Moreover, the magnitudes on the correlation in between temperature and vegetation greenness had been commonly significantly smaller than those from the correlation amongst humidity (i.e., precipitation and VPD) and vegetation greenness. This suggests that the interannual vegetation dynamics within this region could be driven by 11 of 20 soil moisture and atmospheric humidity–that is, precipitation and VPD, if we assume that precipitation is related to soil moisture, and VPD represents air humidity.Figure 7. Correlation coefficients amongst the detrended growing season NDVI as well as the detrended Figure 7. Correlation coefficients amongst the detrended developing season NDVI as well as the detrended expanding season temperature, precipitation, too as atmospheric vapor stress deficit (VPD) growing season temperature, precipitation, at the same time as atmospheric vapor stress deficit (VPD) at at the meteorological stations in the the period from 2000 to 2016. NDVI meteorological station the nine nine meteorological stations in period from 2000 to 2016. NDVI at aat a me.
