Xclude “Include patents” and “Include quotes”. The search resulted in 1079 hits for sound localization and 670 hits for sound lateralization. These contents have been sorted in descending order of relevance. The 1000 hits on the upper limit displayed in the best for sound localization along with the 670 hits for sound lateralization have been investigated. After inspection of your URLs, it was identified that 982 hits for sound localization and 653 hits for sound lateralization had been valid for analysis, right after excluding hyperlinks that displayed a “Not found” or “Not connected” message. These hit numbers were set as the initial values for screening for this evaluation. The screening course of action and also the number of resulting hits are shown in Figure 1. Consequently, nine scientific articles for the assessment of sound localization and five for sound lateralization were picked up. The 5 articles for sound lateralization, nonetheless, have been precisely the same because the nine articles for localization, so these nine articles had been chosen. In addition, the nine articles for sound localization had been categorized into these with normal-hearing participants with bilateral simulated CHL (3 articles: Table 1) and these with bilateral CHL (six articles: Table two).Audiol. Res. 2021,Table 1. Studies on sound localization or lateralization with bone conduction for simulated conductive hearing loss from 2012 to August 2021. No. Authors (Year) Participants Devices Stimuli Presentation Levels Setup Twelve loudspeakers (aligned in a horizontal circular setup: an angular interval of 30 ) Test Situations Evaluation of BCD1 (ADHEAR), comparison between unilateral and bilateral fitting, and comparison among BCD1 and BCD2 (Baha 5) (i) Unaided, (ii) aided with 1 BAHS sound processor mounted on a SoundArc, (iii) aided with 2 BAHS sound processors on a single SoundArc, (iv) aided with 1 BAHS sound processor on a softband, and (v) aided with two BAHS sound processors on a single soft band Typical hearing, unilateral plug, unilateral plug + ipsilateral aBCD, unilateral plug +ipsilateral aBCD+ contralateral pinna mold, bilateral plugs, bilateral plugs + bilateral aBCDs, and bilateral plugs + unilateral aBCDGawliczek et al. (2018a) [21]15 participants with induced bilateral CHLaBCD(s) (ADHEAR) and BCD(s) attached to a softband (Baha5)White noise (200 ms CL-287088;LL-F28249 �� Formula duration)Among 60 and 65 dB SPLGawliczek et al. (2018b) [22]15 participants with simulated bilateral CHL having a mixture of ear plugs and silicon mould materialBCD(s) (Baha5) (SoundArc plus a softband)White noise (200 ms duration)60, 65, and 70 dB SPLTwelve loudspeakers (aligned in a horizontal circular setup: an angular interval of 30 )Snapp et al. (2020) [23]11 listeners with simulated CHL with plug(s)aBCD(s) (ADHER)Broadband (BB; 0.50 kHz), high-pass (HP; 30 kHz), and low-pass (LP; 0.five.5 kHz) noise bursts (150 ms duration)45, 55, and 65 dB ATwenty-four loudspeakers (the horizontal (0 ) and vertical (+40 /-30 ) planes (The speakers were covered by a black, sound emitting L-Norvaline supplier curtain)Abbreviations: aBCD, adhesive bone conduction device; BAHS, bone-anchored hearing systems; CHL, conductive hearing loss.Audiol. Res. 2021,Table 2. Studies on sound localization or lateralization with bone conduction device(s) for bilateral conductive hearing loss from 2012 to August 2021.No. Authors (Year) Participants ten children with severe bilateral CHL because of congenital main or minor ear anomalies with microtia or anotia or because of resistant chronic inflammation 32 sufferers with conge.
