R8 0.six, p 0.66; such as individuals who did not punish, r5 0.0, p 0.70). Trait
R8 0.six, p 0.66; like people that did not punish, r5 0.0, p 0.70). Trait empathic concern didn’t predict altruistic behavior in any game in response to fairgenerous dictator transfers (all p’s .63). In the unfair condition, greater empathic concern was still associated with altruistic helping and punishment (Salvianic acid A site Punishers only), even immediately after controlling for potentially confounding variables of social desirability, behavior when playing as the dictator, family income, player order, prior earnings and punishment ahead of playing because the third party, and present positive and negative have an effect on (Tables and two). People who reported greater compassion spent extra inside the assisting game and spent less in PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24713140 the punishment game if they decided to punish at all (all p’s 0.05; Tables and two). Game variations in empathic concernaltruism relationships. In the unfair context, the good connection involving empathic concern and helping behavior was drastically different in the unfavorable connection among empathic concern and punishment behavior in Punishers (Z 2.87, p 0.0; including assisting game outliers Z 2.62, p .0). In terms of the strength of your empathic concernbehavior relationship, the redistribution game demonstrated comparable patterns as the helping game. The empathic concernredistribution correlation didn’t drastically differ from the empathic concernhelping correlation (Z .9, p 0.23; such as assisting game outliers Z .53, p 0.3), but was substantially greater than the empathic concernpunishment correlation in Punishers (Z three.69, p 0.00). This pattern of results was confirmed even when controlling for confounding elements. The positive association between empathic concern and assisting behavior was greater than the negative association amongst empathic concern and punishment (Helping vs. Punishers interaction term R2 modify 0.06, F,99 four.7, p 0.00). Furthermore, the constructive relationships that empathic concern demonstrates with helping and redistribution behavior did not substantially differ from each and every other immediately after controlling for significant confounding things (Redistribution vs. Helping interaction term R2 adjust 0.008, F,50 .82, p 0.8; such as assisting game outliers R2 transform .0, F,52 two.65, p 0.). Redistribution was considerably much more associatedPLOS 1 DOI:0.37journal.pone.043794 December 0,0 Compassion and AltruismTable . Trait empathic concern predicts altruistic behavior following an unfair dictator transfer even right after controlling for confounding variables in a hierarchical regression model. Step modeled prospective confounding variables of social desirability, general prosocial behavior (as indicated by transfers created when participants played as the dictator), household income, prior earnings or punishment within the game before playing because the third party, and existing mood (state optimistic or unfavorable affect). Trait empathic concern (the emotional element of compassion) was entered in Step 2 and was measured by the Empathic Concern subscale from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 980). Punishers represent a subset of participants who played the Punishment Game that decided to punish by spending 0 (N 3789). Game Assisting N (Unfair) Step : Confounds R2 Step two: Empathic Concern R2 p 0.05 p 0.0 p 0.00 ^ When the two “extreme altruist” outliers had been integrated in the Assisting Game regression, the partnership involving empathic concern and helping behavior became nonsignificant (Empathic Concern R2 0.06, p 0.
