Ain about the polarity or condition of bismuth when in the
Ain concerning the polarity or situation of bismuth when within the magnetic field: `is it as I think or as Weber thinks’.236 On 26 August Tyndall repeated experiments he had previously made on the polarity of bismuth `and identified them all right. Von Feilitsch (sic) will have to have utilized a rough apparatus when he was unable to reproduce them’.237 This refers to von Feilitzsch’s two papers in Poggendorff’s Annalen for 854,238 which followed two223 224Tyndall to Faraday, 25 June 854 (Letter 2858 in F. A. J. L. James (note 56)). Faraday to Tyndall, 28 June 854 (Letter 2859 in F. A. J. L. James (note 56)). Tyndall to Faraday, 30 June 854 (Letter 286 in F. A. J. L. James (note 56)). 226 Philip Yorke (799874), chemist. 227 Royal Society Minutes of Council, 29 June 854, which implies Sabine told him ahead of the selection had been formally made. 228 Weber to Tyndall, 23 July 854, R MS JTW3. The letter of 3 July has not been discovered. 229 Tyndall, Journal, six August 854. 230 Tyndall, Journal, 9 August 854. 23 Tyndall, Journal, 0 August 854. 232 Tyndall, Journal, five August 854. 233 Tyndall, Journal, eight August 854. 234 Tyndall, Journal 22 August 854. 235 Tyndall, Journal 23 August 854. 236 Faraday’s Diary, Vol. six, 288. 237 Tyndall, Journal, 26 August 854. 238 F. C. O. 
von Feilitzsch, `Erkl ung der diamagnetischen Wirkungsweise durch die Amp e’sche Theorie’, Annalen der Physik und Chemie (854), 92, 3660 and 5366.Roland Jacksonearlier papers in 852.239 Von Feilitzsch sent the latter two papers to Faraday on August.240 By two September, possessing worked within the laboratory every single day apart from Sundays, Tyndall was capable to write `diamagnetic polarity is secure’, and to begin writing his memoir on PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25045247 the topic.24 He received a letter from von Feilitzsch on 9 September nevertheless it seems to have been lost. On the other hand, Tyndall refers to such a letter in a letter to Hirst: I have been engaged within a tolerably exhaustive comparison of magnetism and diamagnetism, and have I trust established a compete [sic] antithesis all through, and proved beyond a doubt that diamagnetic bodies possess polarity the reverse of that of iron. Weber’s views and mine thus far coincide, but I’m firmly convinced that Weber’s 6R-BH4 dihydrochloride biological activity hypothesis is false. The experiments please me simply because they leave no doubt upon the thoughts and I have strengthened the action, and enhanced the mode of operation so as to permit me to detect the actions sought in masses of bismuth not a handful of grains in weight, but in cylinders [4] inches lengthy and an inch in diameter. Feilitsch (sic) has written to me lately and sent me his current memoirs where he professes to prove that diamagnetic bodies and magnetic ones possess the identical polarity. Quite a few in the actions which he failed to receive I’ve succeeded in acquiring, and I imagine his experiments can not stand for an immediate in opposition for the evidence which I can bring to bear against them.242 5. British Association Meeting in Liverpool, 854 Getting missed the meeting in Hull in 853 though in Paris, Tyndall travelled to Liverpool on 20 September for the meeting which took location from 20 to 27 September 854, for which he was a Secretary to Section A, and took lodgings with Francis. On 2 September, Tyndall gave a paper on the magnetic field.243 This paper stimulated a in which Whewell, Thomson and Faraday joined,244 and was reported at length in Athenaeum.245 Tyndall showed the distinction amongst the impact of flat and pointed poles on regardless of whether bars of magnetic and diamagnetic substances set axially or equatori.
