Share this post on:

R cities in China with similar socioeconomic circumstances.PLOS One particular DOI
R cities in China with related socioeconomic conditions.PLOS 1 DOI:0.37journal.pone.03472 August 4,9 MSM amongst Rural Migrants in China: GISGPS Random Sample SurveyTable 2. Migration Expertise and Comparison of Living Situation, Neighborhood Environment and HIVrelated Risk Behaviors amongst Rural Migrants and order BCTC Nonmigrant Urban and Rural Residents, Mean or [95 CI]. Variables Migration experiences No. of cities migrated, city two cities !four cities Years migrated to Wuhan Median [IQR] No. of property visits inside the past year, 0 time times !3 times Sending cash house Yes Intention to move, Most likely Unsure Unlikely Living circumstances Residential areas, Old town New town Ruralurban joint zone Suburban Housing ownership, Owner Rental Other individuals Living arrangement, Living alone With others Neighborhood environment Perceived safety, Protected Unsure Unsafe Perceived urban residents about, Much less than half A half Extra than a half Presence of prior acquaintances, Yes Existence of entertainment venues, None Some A good deal Accessibility of entertainment venues, (Continued) two.five [9.2,5.7] 60.five [55.4,65.5] 27. [22.3,three.8] 2.2 [9.three,5.] 58.9 [54.five,63.2] 28.9 [2532.8] 69.2[64.4,74.0] 26.7[22.3,three.] 4. [.five, six.6] 73.0 [68.two,77.9] 74.two [70.3,78.2] NA 30.six [26.8,34.5] 6.four [.4,two.4] 53.0 [47.six,58.4] 3. [0.0,six.2] 5.9 [2.four,9.3] 7.0 [67.0,75.] NA NA NA 68.9 [6473.7] 24.four [9.8,29.0] 6.7 [4.7, eight.6] 63.5 [59.5,67.6] 30.0 [26.2,33.9] 6.four [4.two, eight.7] 55.4[49.five,6.2] 33.6[28.3,38.9] .0[7.six,four.4] 50.0 [44.9,55.2] 50.0 [44.8,55.] 40.five [36.two,44.8] 59.five [55.two,63.8] 33.7[28.2,39.] 66.3[60.9,7.8] 7.two [420.3] 67.6 [62.9,72.3] five.2 [9.3] 70. [66.3,73.8] .six [9.0,four.3] 8.three [5.two,2.5] NA NA NA 4.four [36.2,46.7] 39.0 [34.three,43.8] 9.7 [7.0,two.5] 9.8 [72.5] 55.8 [5.6,60.0] eight.3 [5.0,two.6] 2.0 [7.six,24.5] 4.9 [3.7,six.] NA NA NA NA 3.9 [27.7,36.2] three.5 [0.six,6.5] 54.5 [49.8,59.3] 9.2 [6.86] 0.[7.3,two.8] 80.8[77.three,84.3] 4.2[0.4,7.9] 2.9[9.0,6.9] 72.9[67.eight,78.0] 86.9 [82.two,9.6] NA NA 8. [5.5,0.8] 34.0 [2839.9] 57.9 [5263.7] NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.0 [3.5, 5.7] NA NA 25.9 [20.9,30.8] 43.six [38.0,49.2] 30.five [2536.0] NA NA NA NA NA NA Rural migrants Urban residents Rural residentsPLOS A single DOI:0.37journal.pone.03472 August 4,0 MSM among Rural Migrants in China: GISGPS Random Sample SurveyTable 2. (Continued) Variables Convenient Unsure Inconvenient HIVrelated risk behaviors Engage in industrial sex Yes Constant condom use Yes Frequent drinkers Yes Frequent alcohol intoxicated Yes Binge drinkers Yes Problem drinkers Yes Every day smokers Yes 32.six [28 37.2] 42.two [37.9, 46.5] 42. [36 48.0] 54. [49.2, 59.] 46.3 [4.9, 50.7] 49. [43.3, 54.9] 9. [6.0, 22.2] 28.four [25.0, 3.9] 24.7 [2.two, 28.] 45. [4.three, 48.9] 48.8 [45.0, 52.5] 55.9 [5.9, 59.8] 24.7 [2.3, 28.0] 25.four [22.0, 28.9] 36.9 [33 40.7] 24. [20 28.] 23.7 [8.9, 28.5] 3.4 [6.9, 9.9] five.6 [4.7, 6.5] 4.9 [3 6.7] three.0 [.two, 4.7] Rural migrants 58.five [53.7,63.3] 27. [23.two,30.9] 4.four [.4,7.4] Urban residents 60. [56.0,64.2] 24.six [2.2,28.0] 5.3 [2.2,eight.4] Rural residents 24.7[9.8,29.7] 23.2[8.2,28.3] 52.[46.two,57.9]Note: Estimated with data collected from random samples. An exclusive 95 CI of a measure indicates a considerable distinction at p .05 level amongst the rural PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180537 migrant sample plus the nonmigrant urban and rural resident samples. NA: Not applicable because the data had been not collected for nonmigrants. doi:0.37journal.pone.03472.tSignificantly far more MSM amongst rural migrants with high prevalence of HIV threat behaviorResults of this study show that it really is not the HIV threat behavi.

Share this post on:

Author: Menin- MLL-menin