To become peer leaders who could coordinate the continuation of group yoga, thereby promoting maintenance of yoga practice over time. To advance the evidence base for clinical practice, researchers can implement and evaluate resourceful protocols such as the rerandomization of study participants to specific maintenance programs upon completion of the intervention, an approach used in the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program, a randomized controlled trial among women with type 2 diabetes.40 Improvements in measurement are necessary as well, beginning with attempts to standardize the assessment of personal yoga practice. The DAYS and WHYS intervention was designed using a group format; therefore, it is possible that the participants’ preference for group yoga may have been an artifact of the group design. Additional possibilities for future research include I-CBP112 price feasibility studies using various approaches to individual or self-paced yoga instruction.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported in part by the University of Virginia Institute on Aging, grant numbers R21AT-0002982 and 1-K01-AT-004108 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) and the Office of Women’s Health (OWH), and grant number T32-AT-000052 from NCCAM. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Virginia, NCCAM, OWH, or the National Institutes of Health. Without the exceptional transcription of Mrs Karen Johnson, neither data analysis nor article development would have been possible. We are deeply grateful for her time and attention to detail.
This paper reviews methods for analyzing individual preferences and choices about where to live, and also the implications of these choices for residential patterns.2 Residential mobility is a key determinant of the spatial distribution of populations; the segregation of persons who differ in socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity; and the stability and quality of children’s homes and neighborhoods. Patterns of residential choice have implications for the persistence of racial segregation and the concentration of neighborhood poverty. One can use data on residential preferences and mobility to investigate how different characteristics of neighborhoods (e.g., their race-ethnic and economic composition) affect the desirability of that area. Such studies examine either preferences for neighborhood characteristics (as observed in vignette studies) (e.g., Farley et al. 1978; Mare and Bruch 2003; Charles 2005) or the AZD-8835 biological activity relationship between neighborhood characteristics and the actual choices made by1The authors acknowledge funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The paper benefited greatly from the comments provided by three anonymous reviewers. Correspondence may be directed to [email protected]. 2We focus on one aspect of human migration, namely residential mobility in urban settings and its implications for neighborhood change. However, the methods described in this paper can in principle also be applied to the analysis of international or other longdistance migration.Bruch and MarePageindividuals (e.g., Quillian 1999; Crowder and South 2008). One can also use residential choice data to explore the extent to which people’s choices are constrained by discrimina.To become peer leaders who could coordinate the continuation of group yoga, thereby promoting maintenance of yoga practice over time. To advance the evidence base for clinical practice, researchers can implement and evaluate resourceful protocols such as the rerandomization of study participants to specific maintenance programs upon completion of the intervention, an approach used in the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program, a randomized controlled trial among women with type 2 diabetes.40 Improvements in measurement are necessary as well, beginning with attempts to standardize the assessment of personal yoga practice. The DAYS and WHYS intervention was designed using a group format; therefore, it is possible that the participants’ preference for group yoga may have been an artifact of the group design. Additional possibilities for future research include feasibility studies using various approaches to individual or self-paced yoga instruction.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported in part by the University of Virginia Institute on Aging, grant numbers R21AT-0002982 and 1-K01-AT-004108 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) and the Office of Women’s Health (OWH), and grant number T32-AT-000052 from NCCAM. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Virginia, NCCAM, OWH, or the National Institutes of Health. Without the exceptional transcription of Mrs Karen Johnson, neither data analysis nor article development would have been possible. We are deeply grateful for her time and attention to detail.
This paper reviews methods for analyzing individual preferences and choices about where to live, and also the implications of these choices for residential patterns.2 Residential mobility is a key determinant of the spatial distribution of populations; the segregation of persons who differ in socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity; and the stability and quality of children’s homes and neighborhoods. Patterns of residential choice have implications for the persistence of racial segregation and the concentration of neighborhood poverty. One can use data on residential preferences and mobility to investigate how different characteristics of neighborhoods (e.g., their race-ethnic and economic composition) affect the desirability of that area. Such studies examine either preferences for neighborhood characteristics (as observed in vignette studies) (e.g., Farley et al. 1978; Mare and Bruch 2003; Charles 2005) or the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and the actual choices made by1The authors acknowledge funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The paper benefited greatly from the comments provided by three anonymous reviewers. Correspondence may be directed to [email protected]. 2We focus on one aspect of human migration, namely residential mobility in urban settings and its implications for neighborhood change. However, the methods described in this paper can in principle also be applied to the analysis of international or other longdistance migration.Bruch and MarePageindividuals (e.g., Quillian 1999; Crowder and South 2008). One can also use residential choice data to explore the extent to which people’s choices are constrained by discrimina.
