Ot a supplementary use of gesture either as the information conveyed in the gesture introduces a new dimension (width) not mentioned at all in speech. Importantly, although the information conveyed in gesture is different from that conveyed in the accompanying speech (a gesture-speech mismatch), the two pieces of information are not contradictory and have the potential to be integrated: height (in the child’s speech) and width (in the child’s gesture) are both necessary components to understanding conservation of quantity. Interestingly, speakers who produce gesture-speech mismatches on a task are more likely to profit from instruction on that task than speakers who do not produce mismatches, suggesting that gesture and speech share a single underlying system even though the information expressed in the two modalities does not always match (Church and GoldinMeadow 1986, Goldin-Meadow, Alibali and Church 1993). Gesture can tell us who is ready to learn. Moreover, gesture can propel learning ?encouraging learners to gesture as they speak (Beaudoin-Ryan and Goldin-Meadow 2014; Broaders et al. 2007), or teaching them to use specific gestures (Goldin-Meadow, Cook, and Mitchell 2009; Novack et al 2014), can give them new ideas on topics as varied as Piagetian conservation of quantity, moral reasoning, and mathematical equivalence. Along the same lines, gesture both provides a window onto the approaching Metformin (hydrochloride)MedChemExpress 1,1-Dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride linguistic milestones of the child (Iverson and Goldin-Meadow 2005; Cartmill, Hunsicker and GoldinMeadow 2014; see Goldin-Meadow 2014 for a recent overview), and offers a tool for increasing vocabulary size (LeBarton, Goldin-Meadow, and Raudenbush 2015). Moreover, Alibali, Evans, Hostetter, Ryan, and Mainela-Arnold (2009) have shown that child narratives include more non-redundant gesture-speech combinations than those produced by adults, suggesting that gesture may serve as a compensatory communicative device. Gesture can also serve as both a compensatory and facilitatory device in the acquisition of a second language in adult learners (Gullberg 1998, Marcos 1979, McCafferty 2002). In addition to playing a causal role in learning, gesturing can fulfill a wide range of other cognitive functions. First, gesture may help speakers find the right words. Gestures have been shown to facilitate lexical access and may play a role in the resolution of tip of the tongue states (de Ruiter 2000; Frick-Horbury and Guttentag 1998; Krauss 1998), although it may be movement per se that boosts lexical access (Ravizza 2003). Second, gestures may help speakers talk about, and think about, space. Gesture is particularly frequent when speech GSK-AHAB supplier includes spatial content (see Alibali 2005 for a review and Hostetter and Alibali 2011 for a discussion of how this may relate to individual differences in cognitive skills), and prohibiting gesture leads to a decrease in speech rate in utterances with spatial content (Rauscher, Krauss and Chen 1996). More direct evidence for gesture’s role in spatial understanding comes from encouraging people to gesture on a spatial task such as mental rotation and finding improvement in their performance (Chu and Kita 2011). Third, speakers gesture more on problems that are conceptually difficult, even when lexical demands are equated (Alibali, Kita and Young 2000; Hostetter, Alibali, and Kita 2007; Kita and DaviesAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Linguist Compass. Author manuscript; available in PM.Ot a supplementary use of gesture either as the information conveyed in the gesture introduces a new dimension (width) not mentioned at all in speech. Importantly, although the information conveyed in gesture is different from that conveyed in the accompanying speech (a gesture-speech mismatch), the two pieces of information are not contradictory and have the potential to be integrated: height (in the child’s speech) and width (in the child’s gesture) are both necessary components to understanding conservation of quantity. Interestingly, speakers who produce gesture-speech mismatches on a task are more likely to profit from instruction on that task than speakers who do not produce mismatches, suggesting that gesture and speech share a single underlying system even though the information expressed in the two modalities does not always match (Church and GoldinMeadow 1986, Goldin-Meadow, Alibali and Church 1993). Gesture can tell us who is ready to learn. Moreover, gesture can propel learning ?encouraging learners to gesture as they speak (Beaudoin-Ryan and Goldin-Meadow 2014; Broaders et al. 2007), or teaching them to use specific gestures (Goldin-Meadow, Cook, and Mitchell 2009; Novack et al 2014), can give them new ideas on topics as varied as Piagetian conservation of quantity, moral reasoning, and mathematical equivalence. Along the same lines, gesture both provides a window onto the approaching linguistic milestones of the child (Iverson and Goldin-Meadow 2005; Cartmill, Hunsicker and GoldinMeadow 2014; see Goldin-Meadow 2014 for a recent overview), and offers a tool for increasing vocabulary size (LeBarton, Goldin-Meadow, and Raudenbush 2015). Moreover, Alibali, Evans, Hostetter, Ryan, and Mainela-Arnold (2009) have shown that child narratives include more non-redundant gesture-speech combinations than those produced by adults, suggesting that gesture may serve as a compensatory communicative device. Gesture can also serve as both a compensatory and facilitatory device in the acquisition of a second language in adult learners (Gullberg 1998, Marcos 1979, McCafferty 2002). In addition to playing a causal role in learning, gesturing can fulfill a wide range of other cognitive functions. First, gesture may help speakers find the right words. Gestures have been shown to facilitate lexical access and may play a role in the resolution of tip of the tongue states (de Ruiter 2000; Frick-Horbury and Guttentag 1998; Krauss 1998), although it may be movement per se that boosts lexical access (Ravizza 2003). Second, gestures may help speakers talk about, and think about, space. Gesture is particularly frequent when speech includes spatial content (see Alibali 2005 for a review and Hostetter and Alibali 2011 for a discussion of how this may relate to individual differences in cognitive skills), and prohibiting gesture leads to a decrease in speech rate in utterances with spatial content (Rauscher, Krauss and Chen 1996). More direct evidence for gesture’s role in spatial understanding comes from encouraging people to gesture on a spatial task such as mental rotation and finding improvement in their performance (Chu and Kita 2011). Third, speakers gesture more on problems that are conceptually difficult, even when lexical demands are equated (Alibali, Kita and Young 2000; Hostetter, Alibali, and Kita 2007; Kita and DaviesAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Linguist Compass. Author manuscript; available in PM.
