Was obtained from Polymun Scientific. The TLR ligands FSL-1 (TLR2/6), Poly I:C (TLR3), Pam3CSK4 (TLR1/2), R848 (TLR7/8) were purchased from Invivogen, monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPLA, TLR4) from SIGMA and CpGB (TLR9) from MWG. Chitosan was provided by Novamatrix.Detection of IgG subtypesSpecific IgG subclasses were detected as described above, using anti-mouse IgG1 HRP and anti-mouse IgG2a HRP (Serotec).Statistical Anlotinib chemical information analysisThe statistical difference between groups was determined by Mann-Whitney test and one way ANOVA. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v 4. Significant differences between the different antigen/adjuvant groups and the no adjuvant control group were indicated as follows: * for p#0.05, ** for p#0.01 and *** for p#0.001.Mice and immunisationsEthics Statement: All animals were handled and procedures performed in strict accordance with the terms of a project licence (PPL 70/6613) granted under the UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the study was approved by the animal ethics committee of St. George’s University of London. Mice were maintained in conditions conforming to UK Home Office guidelines to ameliorate suffering and were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Female BALB/c mice, aged 6? weeks were purchased from Harlan. For vaginal immunisation protocols, prior to the first immunisation mice were given subcutaneously 2 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (Pharmacia Limited). Nasal and vaginal immunisations were performed in a final volume of 20 ml containing 10 mg of antigen (either gp140 or Tetanus Toxoid) and either 20 mg of TLR ligand or 100 mg of chitosan, in PBS. Sublingual immunisations were performed using the same amount of antigen and ligand in a final volume of 10 ml and, after each immunisation, animals were kept under anaesthesia with their head positioned in ante-flexion for 10 min to avoid swallowing. For the parenteral route, mice were immunised subcutaneously with the same amounts of antigen (10 mg) and adjuvant (20 mg for TLR ligands and 100 mg for chitosan) in a final volume of 50 ml. All the animals were vaccinated three times with an interval 1655472 of twoResultsIn order to determine the impact of the route of immunisation on systemic and vaginal humoral responses to gp140, animals were immunised by sublingual, nasal, vaginal and parenteral routes with a range of TLR ligands (FSL-1 (TLR2/6), poly I:C (TLR3), MPLA (TLR4), CpG-B (TLR9), Pam3CSK4 (TLR1/2), R848 (TLR7/8)) and chitosan. To evaluate the influence of the antigen on the responses to mucosal immunisation parallel experiments were performed using Tetanus Lecirelin Toxoid (TT).Sublingual immunisation with gp140 and TTSublingual immunisation with CN54gp140 induced good systemic IgG responses, with endpoint titres up to 105 when the antigen was administered alone. A similar pattern in IgG and IgA responses was observed when the antigen was given in combination with FSL-1, Pam3CSK4, R848 or chitosan, whilst poly I:C significantly increased systemic IgG and IgA titres (p = 0.03 and p = 0.015 respectively). MPLA was the only adjuvant candidate that appeared to dampen specific responses (Figure 1A and B). InMucosal TLR Adjuvants for HIV-gpvaginal wash samples, low but detectable IgG responses were observed in some animals (Figure 1C), however these were inconsistent with none of the groups showing detectable responses in all animals. In contrast, IgA titres were detected in all animals where antigen was administered with FSL-1, poly I:.Was obtained from Polymun Scientific. The TLR ligands FSL-1 (TLR2/6), Poly I:C (TLR3), Pam3CSK4 (TLR1/2), R848 (TLR7/8) were purchased from Invivogen, monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPLA, TLR4) from SIGMA and CpGB (TLR9) from MWG. Chitosan was provided by Novamatrix.Detection of IgG subtypesSpecific IgG subclasses were detected as described above, using anti-mouse IgG1 HRP and anti-mouse IgG2a HRP (Serotec).Statistical analysisThe statistical difference between groups was determined by Mann-Whitney test and one way ANOVA. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v 4. Significant differences between the different antigen/adjuvant groups and the no adjuvant control group were indicated as follows: * for p#0.05, ** for p#0.01 and *** for p#0.001.Mice and immunisationsEthics Statement: All animals were handled and procedures performed in strict accordance with the terms of a project licence (PPL 70/6613) granted under the UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the study was approved by the animal ethics committee of St. George’s University of London. Mice were maintained in conditions conforming to UK Home Office guidelines to ameliorate suffering and were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Female BALB/c mice, aged 6? weeks were purchased from Harlan. For vaginal immunisation protocols, prior to the first immunisation mice were given subcutaneously 2 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (Pharmacia Limited). Nasal and vaginal immunisations were performed in a final volume of 20 ml containing 10 mg of antigen (either gp140 or Tetanus Toxoid) and either 20 mg of TLR ligand or 100 mg of chitosan, in PBS. Sublingual immunisations were performed using the same amount of antigen and ligand in a final volume of 10 ml and, after each immunisation, animals were kept under anaesthesia with their head positioned in ante-flexion for 10 min to avoid swallowing. For the parenteral route, mice were immunised subcutaneously with the same amounts of antigen (10 mg) and adjuvant (20 mg for TLR ligands and 100 mg for chitosan) in a final volume of 50 ml. All the animals were vaccinated three times with an interval 1655472 of twoResultsIn order to determine the impact of the route of immunisation on systemic and vaginal humoral responses to gp140, animals were immunised by sublingual, nasal, vaginal and parenteral routes with a range of TLR ligands (FSL-1 (TLR2/6), poly I:C (TLR3), MPLA (TLR4), CpG-B (TLR9), Pam3CSK4 (TLR1/2), R848 (TLR7/8)) and chitosan. To evaluate the influence of the antigen on the responses to mucosal immunisation parallel experiments were performed using Tetanus Toxoid (TT).Sublingual immunisation with gp140 and TTSublingual immunisation with CN54gp140 induced good systemic IgG responses, with endpoint titres up to 105 when the antigen was administered alone. A similar pattern in IgG and IgA responses was observed when the antigen was given in combination with FSL-1, Pam3CSK4, R848 or chitosan, whilst poly I:C significantly increased systemic IgG and IgA titres (p = 0.03 and p = 0.015 respectively). MPLA was the only adjuvant candidate that appeared to dampen specific responses (Figure 1A and B). InMucosal TLR Adjuvants for HIV-gpvaginal wash samples, low but detectable IgG responses were observed in some animals (Figure 1C), however these were inconsistent with none of the groups showing detectable responses in all animals. In contrast, IgA titres were detected in all animals where antigen was administered with FSL-1, poly I:.
