H. Nuclei were stained with Hoescht dye (blue). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050278.gdilution) in blocking buffer overnight, followed by a washing step, and incubation in goat anti-mouse IgG1-Alexa 488 (1:1000 dilution) in blocking buffer for 2 h, images were captured with a Nikon Eclipse E800 compound microscope with CCD camera, using Nikon analysis software. Nuclei were stained with Hoescht 
dye.DNA-protein Binding StudiesElectrophoretic gel-mobility shift assays and DNA competition experiments were performed as described [31] with Cos-7 nuclear protein extracts and 59-Cy5.5-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides. Sequences for the top strand for all double-stranded DNA probes tested for binding by order 301-00-8 Stat5b are listed in Table 2. The top strand of the Oct-1 probe is as follows (core binding site is underlined): 59-TTTTAGAGGATCCATGCAAATGGACGT ACGT-39. After incubation of proteins and DNA for 60 min at 4uC, products were separated by electrophoresis through nondenaturing 5 polyacrylamide gels in 16 Tris borate/EDTA (90 mM Tris, 90 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) at 200V for 30 min at 20uC. After electrophoresis, gels were dried and the bands representing protein-bound DNA and free probe measured using the LiCoR Odyssey and version 3.0 analysis software. Quantitative DNA-protein binding studies were performed as described [31] with a constant amount of protein (1 mg of Cos-7 cell nuclear extract), and thus a constant quantity of 1485-00-3 transcription factor, and varying concentrations of 59-Cy5.5-labeled probes [0.1 to 15 nM]. Dissociation constants (Kd) were calculated assuming a model of single-site specific binding, using Prism 5.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) to perform a least-squares nonlinear fit of the saturation binding curves. Competition experiments employed nuclear protein extracts 23977191 (2 mg) and varying amounts of unlabeled homologous and heterologous competitor DNAs. Calculations of dissociation constants for competitors (IC50) were performed with Prism 5.01 for Windows, using a single-site model that constrained the maximal and minimal “bound” values.Statistical AnalysisData are presented as mean6S.E. Statistical significance was determined using either paired or unpaired Student’s t test, with the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons in the latter, and is indicated in 23727046 each figure legend.Results Stat5b Binding Elements Confer GH Responsiveness to Igf1 PromoterIn previous studies we used a combination of bioinformatics and chromatin immuno-precipitation experiments to identify 7 distinct regions in the rat Igf1 locus that exhibited acute GH-stimulated binding of Stat5b in hepatic chromatin [34], and found in preliminary studies that all of these domains except for R8-9 could enhance the activity of Igf1 promoters in a GH- and Stat5bdependent way [34]. We now have investigated the functional and biochemical properties of these elements in detail as a means of elucidating the mechanisms by which they contribute to regulationof IGF-I gene transcription. The overall anatomy of the rat Igf1 locus is depicted in Fig. 1A, with the location of each of the putative enhancer domains indicated; a higher power view of their individual organization is illustrated in Fig. 1B. With the exception of R13, each of the 6 elements tested encodes two or three bona fide Stat5 binding sites, each consisting of the DNA sequence, 59-TTC NNN GAA-39 (top strand, where N = G, A, T, or C), with individual sites being separated by 6?51.H. Nuclei were stained with Hoescht dye (blue). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050278.gdilution) in blocking buffer overnight, followed by a washing step, and incubation in goat anti-mouse IgG1-Alexa 488 (1:1000 dilution) in blocking buffer for 2 h, images were captured with a Nikon Eclipse E800 compound microscope with CCD camera, using Nikon analysis software. Nuclei were stained with Hoescht dye.DNA-protein Binding StudiesElectrophoretic gel-mobility shift assays and DNA competition experiments were performed as described [31] with Cos-7 nuclear protein extracts and 59-Cy5.5-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides. Sequences for the top strand for all double-stranded DNA probes tested for binding by Stat5b are listed in Table 2. The top strand of the Oct-1 probe is as follows (core binding site is underlined): 59-TTTTAGAGGATCCATGCAAATGGACGT ACGT-39. After incubation of proteins and DNA for 60 min at 4uC, products were separated by electrophoresis through nondenaturing 5 polyacrylamide gels in 16 Tris borate/EDTA (90 mM Tris, 90 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) at 200V for 30 min at 20uC. After electrophoresis, gels were dried and the bands representing protein-bound DNA and free probe measured using the LiCoR Odyssey and version 3.0 analysis software. Quantitative DNA-protein binding studies were performed as described [31] with a constant amount of protein (1 mg of Cos-7 cell nuclear extract), and thus a constant quantity of transcription factor, and varying concentrations of 59-Cy5.5-labeled probes [0.1 to 15 nM]. Dissociation constants (Kd) were calculated assuming a model of single-site specific binding, using Prism 5.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) to perform a least-squares nonlinear fit of the saturation binding curves. Competition experiments employed nuclear protein extracts 23977191 (2 mg) and varying amounts of unlabeled homologous and heterologous competitor DNAs. Calculations of dissociation constants for competitors (IC50) were performed with Prism 5.01 for Windows, using a single-site model that constrained the maximal and minimal “bound” values.Statistical AnalysisData are presented as mean6S.E. Statistical significance was determined using either paired or unpaired Student’s t test, with the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons in the latter, and is indicated in 23727046 each figure legend.Results Stat5b Binding Elements Confer GH Responsiveness to Igf1 PromoterIn previous studies we used a combination of bioinformatics and chromatin immuno-precipitation experiments to identify 7 distinct regions in the rat Igf1 locus that exhibited acute GH-stimulated binding of Stat5b in hepatic chromatin [34], and found in preliminary studies that all of these domains except for R8-9 could enhance the activity of Igf1 promoters in a GH- and Stat5bdependent way [34]. We now have investigated the functional and biochemical properties of these elements in detail as a means 
of elucidating the mechanisms by which they contribute to regulationof IGF-I gene transcription. The overall anatomy of the rat Igf1 locus is depicted in Fig. 1A, with the location of each of the putative enhancer domains indicated; a higher power view of their individual organization is illustrated in Fig. 1B. With the exception of R13, each of the 6 elements tested encodes two or three bona fide Stat5 binding sites, each consisting of the DNA sequence, 59-TTC NNN GAA-39 (top strand, where N = G, A, T, or C), with individual sites being separated by 6?51.
